Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-9410476-20160921174245/@comment-66.139.154.20-20161004033921

Aeon.zale wrote: Personally, for better or for worse, I have to say that I'm actually on board with the idea of Misstress becoming an admin.Although her edits may have been impulsive (and quite frankly overly so) in the past, I feel like she's learnt her lesson for good this time.

I feel like there are issues (see: translations) which honestly do need solving and someone like Misstress would (under the supervision of Octo) remedy them instead of taking a passive stance in which the information is just left in the articles in a really vague/ambiguous manner. If there's no real reason to appoint her as admin since it wouldn't make any difference then tbh you could make the same argument for Octo.

tl;dr: misstress under the supervision of octo is not the antichrist After the debacle of the Judgment profile translations which was VERY recent, no. And this was after numerous other decisions for which she had been reprimanded by multiple people.

We NEED an admin to make things run smooth. We do not need an admin that is supervised by someone else. As Servant is not coming back, we NEED a new admin. Period. It's not about "there being no difference" so much as a wikia needs on to run smoothly. It's not about being the antichrist so much as Octo's job as admin should be helping the wikia, not supervising someone else so she can have a co-admin.