Talk:Vessels of Sin/@comment-121.175.134.207-20180123053226/@comment-2602:301:77AD:9270:7938:3788:4D3A:B285-20180123153037

To be frank, I'm having a little trouble understanding where you're getting your information. I understand if some creator interviews are old, and thus they've fallen off the wiki's radar, but there's a lot of recent interviews and stuff that we've had people on top of and getting info from. So, which interview is this? The one with Ichika? I don't remember that being a part of what he was saying there. Did this person you talk to mention where in the video he says it?

I don't think Evillious is getting "another ending" based on the inconsistencies with the songs and novels. Mothy even said in the very MOTHY album that his ideas for Re_Birthday have changed since he made the song. So it's not hard to think that his ideas for some of the other content has changed as well. My opinion is based off of what he's done previously with inconsistent canon. He has a history of using language to mask the true plot points of the series, such as referring to demons/demonic vessels as plain old "sin". I'm aware that this "Farce story line", as you keep calling it, appeared in an album--I'm saying that the album was also misleading in many ways. Keep in mind that two of the main narrators for that are Gammon, who doesn't have all the information, and Ma, who lies.

I don't need to convince you of anything--you're welcome to think whatever you like about the series. But I feel if you're expecting mothy to make another alternate ending based solely on the song canon being a little inconsistent, I think you're going to be disappointed.