Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-9410476-20190411063651/@comment-2600:1702:3EC0:4B80:7428:22A:ABB4:C6C-20190627233127

Just because the phrase "safe to assume" was used in that instance (if it was) does not mean the same level of evidence was present therein. As in, there was almost no evidence that Nemesis was Master of the Hellish Yard in all appearances, but we thought so because her song was labeled as such and she called herself such, and we didn't realize there was more than one character with that title.

This situation is more equivalent to us realizing that Master of the Hellish Yard was Gumillia, wherein we had pretty much everything in the story pointing in that direction and people were just reluctant to accept it because nothing explicitly confirmed it outright until later.

So, what actual counterarguments are there that the evidence provided isn't substantial enough? What could Outlaw and Lychgate possibly be referring to if not SCaP?