Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-23.122.217.39-20150626042307/@comment-6986530-20151107232952

That's a good perspective to add, but not sure if it's clinching. After all, the time in the book is at 3, not 4, so mothy might not be drawing on the French meal ritual that you're referring to any more than the British tea time one (as pointed out he may have merged some aspects of both cultures.) And while "snack time" does not have as childish a meaning as in English and refers to an actual meal time, this is about an English translation of the phrase, not a French one, which doesn't have that connotation.

So yes > > but I suppose snack time is more fine in light of that.