Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6192846-20140507131600/@comment-6192846-20140528121551

I am fine with keeping it. Unless anyone wants to dicuss something we may have missed, I think the only point of contention left is Seth's being dismissed/fired, but I think labeling him as "returning" sometime after would be fair for the article.

Whether Act 3 supports, denies, or doesn't bring up Act 1's point, I guess we'll see. The only assumption I'd want to avoid is that Seth is Meta's creator since that would indicate he is even older than he looks (add another twenty years). For that, I'd want to see if Act 3 gives us more info before we make any assumtions.