Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-6192846-20140427232036/@comment-6986530-20140428024345

Welll, I don't really know how well we should trust certain sources overall...I mean, especially for the OSS Act 1's case, there's a lot of stuff that doesn't settle easily with everything else we have. On the other hand, I also can't fathom why someone would lie about it, and my own thoughts are usually that the source with more info is more likely to be correct.

Basically, though, I don't think we should add the info to articles unless it's already been supported or implied elsewhere, or we receive scans confirming it but that's a given :P

If we don't get scans for a very, very long time I might change my stance on some of this information, but I dunno if it's safe. ^ ^;