Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24081824-20160305040159/@comment-6986530-20160309160548

I'm going to agree with Resi and point back to the anon who mentioned the problem with weasel words (although in this case I feel we may end up removing the dracula reference they used as an example anyway unless there's specific mention of it by mothy.) It's not that messy to see the difference between what mothy has confirmed he was going for, and what he has drawn strong parallels to, and what he maybe was going for. The latter is a weasel trivia.

We could hash this out a little more if this is an actual problem for the users willing to apply this new policy. We could create a list of standards trivia points needs to apply to before it gets added. The "glaringly obvious" qualifiers are in reference to something like that. But then there are examples that I think we can immediately say are too weak to stay on trivia, as in the "cramming the Vocaloid name even when the reference is to something else entirely" examples. As well, we can probably remove any trivia that has "might have also been inspired by" statements and the like, because that's a clear case of two people having two different ideas of what mothy was going for.