Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6192846-20140612134000/@comment-6192846-20140912034828

TheKindEvilliousResident~ wrote: Snip But what's the logic flaw? Taking them individually, nothing explicitly states the Gallerian Marlon of JoC and the one of Muzzle are the same; mothy certainly doesn't outright state it. There's certainly lots of context and implications, but no outright statement. When have we ever seen Gallerian in previous media have another green-haired daughter?

And that's my point. Hellish and Nemesis are two characters with overlapping actions given tons of context, implications, and arguably clear evidence of being the same person, but many are holding off because it's not being explicitly stated.

I once again hold up the two Mikulia's example. Why can't the same happen to Gallerian? How is that getting carried away with the logic when we have a clear past example prove it true?

Users are selectively assuming one makes logically no sense (JoC/Muzzle Gallerian), while embracing the same for another (Nemesis/Hellish), when both have evidence and context supporting the coorelation. If users have strong reasons for this case being an exception, then I don't see the problem.

Being cautious solely because it isn't explicit, not for the evidence or (lack thereof) put before us, is imo silly, especially when we get follow-ups like: "Even if it is proven I think we shouldn't combine them."

An honest query: Why are we as a community okay with assuming the character in Girl Went Mad is Nemesis, when we aren't okay with assuming the character in Master of the Hellish Yard is her as well?