Talk:Mukoku/@comment-24103083-20170129111457/@comment-24.176.2.221-20170129194518

I do understand what you're saying, and I think that all makes perfect sense to me. I wholly think we should revise the article and all references to "Miso" as "Mukoku" (as that's the actual name given in the book when referencing it, which perhaps should have tipped us off that it was the actual name and not just an alternate one, but that's beside the point).

You don't have to apologize. Honestly I would have preferred you started with the lengthy comment so we can see where the claims of mistranslation is coming from rather than just being told and not given any evidence.