Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6192846-20140612134000/@comment-6986530-20140914183506

Hierophant Green wrote: I am...confused.We can assume MotHellY is Nemesis herself,but some dots just not connecting, when cross-referencing 4 main sources (JoC,MoN,MOTHY and booklet). MoN, MoTHY, and booklet all correspond to each other, JoC is the only one that throws it into doubt, and assuming it is nonetheless true is what creates any "gaps." The merging side wants to take mothy at his word that the ending of JoC is not true, albeit ideally keeping vague why it isn't true, and subsequently they find no gaps in the narrative.

We can assume MotHellY is awakened Wrath vessel...but what is awakened vessel anyway!? No, we can't assume MotHellY is the awakened vessel of wrath, and no one was suggesting we do. I would contest that being put on her page even if we kept them separate. It's a completely different discussion.

(On another note it's also a fanon that being Master of anything implies an actual transformation or has any significance (in-universe) as opposed to the names (in-universe) being a coincidence, as implied by their varied origins. (Out of universe they are significant because each of them have a song and take on the title of gods and that's it.) It's the same problem as the "Patron Sinner" and "Epitome" fanon.)

Also I would agree let's keep the condescension and incendiary language (censored or not) out of this discussion.