Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-6192846-20140805160134/@comment-24081824-20140805223757

I brought this up with Octo after saying I'd side with Sloth on this one. So a few things were brought up. Things being pages we've used work that, ohoho, wasn't official.

Well. Another thing was brought up in quotes: "As far as I'm concerned, you can argue Ichika's works fall under products of association. No different then the third-party merchandise." Lookin' at you, Mr. Evillious. Lookin' at you.

As great as that is, doesn't this post bring up her wanting to make sure that we know that her fan art is just fan art and whatnot. Sure, for concepts and such, you could pull out this type of argument, but really I'm just wanting to know how much of what we add is completely.

I get that we love Ichika and everything, guys, but.