Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6192846-20140918010005/@comment-6192846-20141230164335

Coppélia wrote: Demon of Lust would be filled with redundancies and assumptions? Please elaborate. It would mostly be the history of Sin of Lust with more dialogue and interactions being detailed. I can understand the others, but the goat on the cover and the demon are given the same description (of what's shown).
 * Yeah they are probably the original demons of sin but no, you should wait for the story elaboration before posting articles. Their articles will indeed be filled with redundancies and assumptions if you make them.

You know what's a better idea? Keep them in an sandbox and work on them however you want, then when the information is actually fully released you can post them publicly without having the possibility of publishing mistakes. That's always an option but these questions are being posed to query the community's stance on whether or not to make the assumption in the first place, should any of them get articles.

Am I interpretting you correctly in thinking they should get articles if we confirm the animals on the cover are them or do you feel we also need to confirm they are (or formerly) were the six kin gods too before giving any of them their own pages?