Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-23.122.217.39-20150626042307/@comment-23.122.217.39-20150726183109

We're not trying to be as literal as possible, we're trying to keep the title from sounding too unwieldy while retaining what it is supposed to mean for the audience. Being literal does not necessarily mean accurate. We though that cutting out Night didn't dramatically change what it means. However, in the grand scheme of things having "Night" in the title isn't the biggest contention I have, and it wasn't even really my idea, so I'm fine with adding it back in. Your arguments do make sense and I can see where you're coming from.

Having "Moonlit Night" as its own term and seperating the "Tale" is better for me than applying "Moonlit" to "Abandonment" with the "Night" cut out (ie, I'm not okay with "Moonlit Abandonment Tale", "A Tale of Moonlit Abandonment" or any other derivations, but I can accept "A Tale of Abandonment on a Moonlit Night", which was actually my first suggestion before we got into all this nonsense and I made a somewhat poorly recieved attempt at reinterpreting the title).

Although again, I know this doesn't seem important, but the "The" in "The Abandonment Moonlit Night Tale" is important to my interpretation that led to how I arranged those words, if we're going to talk about that option > >