Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6192846-20140612134000/@comment-6192846-20140821225622

I have to agree that the logic there sounds flawed.

Gammon and Gallerian talk about a judgment in the past tense, one where "the evidence" was clear by the stab wounds on the victim(s) that Nyoze was the killer (as Gallerian declared). On top of that, Gammon's asking that he "at least" get the sword heirloom back.

That whole conversation seems to void Nyoze getting off on "lack of evidence" (which Gallerian's been demonstrated multiples times that he decides that fact).

Also, even if there was a "good chance" of Nyoze getting off, he wouldn't be allowed to simply walk around, especially if he's being charged for murder with evidence a judge deems sufficient to convict him.

Idk if Nyoze's the lover of Nemesis, but Gallerian's the master of the court (pun intended). It seems a little contrived imo to say he got off a murder trial Gallerian judged him for and then Nemesis is getting hired to shoot him (and she was just totally cool with Daddy putting her boyfriend on trial?).