Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24081824-20160305040159/@comment-24081824-20160309153837

I don't think the ideas are too different. Though, I see how the obvious thing could need more clarification.

What I didn't mention in the post was Bany's example. That idea, which Octo detailed, could be applied to quite a few characters with little room for debate on whether or not it belongs, going by those standards. I think it's needed as well.

As for the "obvious" connection, I can't really make it any more clear than the examples in the original post. Basically, from my perspective, it means a direct reference. Not a could-be reference. Not a very-possibly reference. It really isn't that difficult to decide if you can shake off all those headcanons and useless speculations. Just know that future trivia points is not a user going to a thread and telling everyone that today they discovered Maylis is kinda like this one gal from this one story in like two ways, if short hair counts as one way.

Because as Abyss said, it is not a room for fan theories. That aside, if all else fails I'm fine with taking out whatever isn't confirmed in some way. Whatever it takes to prevent losing the very meaning of trivia all over again.