Talk:Red Shoe Parade/@comment-6416957-20130410105522/@comment-6192846-20130410143921

I am going to disagree here. They label him as a "thief" before he stole anything, "stealing from them before he steals from us". It is the same as their "justice": a label to justify their actions even though that is not the intent.

You can argue their punishment is cruel but I percieve it as more how they are now on the recieving end of their labels. Now they are the ones who have "justice" given to them, cruel or not, just like what they did to their victims. You can argue for their insanity, but it does not portray them as any more sympathetic. That is like saying Kayo's actions are more sympathetic because she was disillusional as well. If anything, it makes them appear less relatable, not more.

As for Gammon, his commentary about the song is directed towards how he finds the characters in the song just as morally reprehensible as "them" (I assue referring to everyone in Gallerian's Theater, possibly himself included) and that he doesn't blame anyone (the humans) for judging "them" (the inhabitants, especially the Master of the Court) as evil. Considering the songs only purpose has been to be a reflection of the Master of the Court (who we assume is the one who wants it to be their recessional hymn to Hell) and Gammon (who organizes the "court cases" and makes his own personal commentary on them), I hazard to guess that Gammon is the one who is supposed to clarify the moral.

I could be wrong though. This is only my personal analysis.