Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6986530-20170321154902/@comment-2600:1702:3EC0:4B80:CDE0:DA8C:BA:656-20190519030626

That's odd--I would think it obvious that "smith" in this case meant his title and not his name. Wasn't there another source that listed his first name as "Smith"? Or was that just a really really bad error by the old translators?