Thread:2602:301:77AD:9270:14E6:440F:798B:87AB/@comment-4698889-20180214033234/@comment-2602:301:77AD:9270:14E6:440F:798B:87AB-20180214065118

As it was before, her name in Japanese was incorrectly written (you do not reverse the order of the Japanese, and you don't put an equals-sign between them). Once that was fixed, that made the romaji inaccurate because it was in Western format, so it had to be changed to Eastern format as well. It seems weird to then write "alternate names" and then. List her proper name. Written in Eastern format.

I mean, sure, yeah, use Western for article title and then make note of the Eastern name in the infobox, but it's incredibly redundant to have "This is her name" and then "this is her other name, which is the exact same name".

I won't quibble over it anymore but there's my two cents.