Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5759915-20160816224415/@comment-23.122.217.39-20160817033349

What's wrong with listing characters who are mentioned in passing? Isn't the whole point of a minor characters list to keep a record of people like that so it's somewhere on the wiki? Why would we cut that information out? Are they somehow less of a minor character because there isn't much content surrounding them? Furthermore, I don't see why them being unnamed or not having dialogue makes a difference.

Take the King of Marlon, for example. He is a character with notable traits (mostly being philandering), he has relevance in other character backstories (like Prim and Kyle), but not only does he never have a single appearance or line of dialogue, he also never gets a name. But it would be gross negligence to not have anything talking about him on the wiki because of his importance.

If you could reasonably indicate a character in some way, either by name, deeds, or relations, they should be listed because they exist in the story. Regardless of how little information there is.

Also I'd say unnamed characters get articles titled as they're called in the minor characters list. Clarith's mother is called Yatski Shama, so that's what the article should say.