Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-23.122.217.39-20150626042307/@comment-67.65.250.197-20150726012829

I think you're missing what I mean: you're sacrificing clarity and getting across the meaning of the single song for the sake of connecting two songs and being technically accurate. Speaking the names aloud, most of them just. Don't feel right at all, for what is known of the songs. IMO, a title should reflect the song and its meaning. But maybe that's just my musical background speaking. Consider the singular songs first and the connection second, because otherwise we're ending up with things that, while one title makes some amount of sense (but doesn't necessarily bring to mind the song itself and creates a different picture), the other doesn't. Flow is important because if it doesn't flow when you say it, then it just ends up sounding stilted. Unless it's purposely stilted (the speech patterns of the dolls in the Bad End Night songs, for example) then you're doing the song a disservice.

As well, we are not Japan and even Mothy has ignored the intended Japanese structure for the sake of English clarity and flow, The Portrait Glassred Drew being the prime example--unless you're going to say Mothy did it wrong.

TLDR; there has to be an option that flows/doesn't come out stilted and doesn't sacrifice clarity over both names for the sheer sake of being as accurate as possible.