Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6192846-20141127231817/@comment-6986530-20150115004207

That's a false comparison. The policy for giving characters without images a page was beneficial in taking the unimaginable scrolling off the minor character lists, according to the community consensus. So for the sake of not making them have an unprofessional looking infobox (and not having an infobox at all carries with it its own issues) I made a placeholder image. It stays consistent in that every character page has a character roughly from the shoulders up in the infobox.

When it comes to full body shots, the majority of characters do not have workable full body shots and so giving the ones that do that for their infobox causes inconsistency in the articles. There is no benefit to full body shots, the only actual argument is "It looks nice." It's not like you can put fake legs or waists on characters that we mostly have headshots of.

This is also getting off topic from the actual discussion, which is choosing between avis, not bringing up something that was already tabled.