Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-6192846-20140427232036/@comment-14867007-20140503233311

Mm, I agree but I guess it depends. If the booklet is without a specific narrator, I don't think it would mean it's lying or trying to contradict itself, it just might be foreshadowing things or not have explained things in detail, which often leads to our confusion until more things come out. (Or worse, mistranslations or the sources are giving out misconceptions.) Whereas, Ma seems has proven herself to be an unreliable narrator, if a character is summarizing events/etc. We can assume that:

A) They are lying

or

B) They obviously don't know what they are talking about or what really happened.

Unless their info doesn't contradict anything and sources prove to be reliable. But it wouldn't hurt to take things with a grain of salt unless we have a thrid-perspective anonymous narrator.