Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6192846-20150410215732/@comment-6192846-20150527013846

146.113.75.124 wrote:

Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Reading through the original discussion, overall user consensus was to keep MotG/Irregular separate from Banica/Allen due to the major timeskip leaving a lot of circumstances unknown, including the exact nature of the relationship between them. MotG in particular was agreed upon to be Banica in some form but would be kept vague and left to the reader to speculate otherwise. That's what is (and should) be reflected in the articles. This was shortly after we were raking in all the new info about Banica from the EFEC novel, including the narration describing her ambition to become the MotG in the unknown future.

Banica's and MotG are definitely portrayed with largely no differences but there are two issues I take, one being the more recent SCP story.

To paraphrase myself, it's understandable that Banica as MotG wouldn't get mentioned since mothy can't (and doesn't) say everything about each contractor's life/actions. In reverse however, it leaves the same ambiguity. Seeing Banica in her original attire with H&G compared to MotG in different attire with alleged copies derived from H&G's wills leaves a jarring hole. We've seen Banica in MotG's attire in one DoE illustration by Ichika for the Demon of Gluttony. Otherwise, she's always been portrayed in her attire from life as a human.

On the second account, we've seen MotG represented as the awakened vessel of gluttony but we still don't know what makes an awakened vessel. That's another major question we would have answered, otherwise we're assuming the Demon of Gluttony is an awakened vessel without even confirming that's within the paremeters of what an awakened vessel is.

These are big gaps for us to jump with the surrounding info and I'm not seeing any contradiction or redundancy if keep the two character articles separate in this case. I think it's better we keep their articles as they are.