Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-9410476-20190411063651/@comment-2600:1702:3EC0:4B80:E4E3:CA83:B90:F01C-20190628031927

1) Mothy changing his mind on minor cosmetic details (I can't recall if that's actually his doing or if it's an issue of the illustrators he has working on the story) is not the same as him altering major plot points.

2) If it's a retcon (which I never said it wasn't), my point is that Outlaw and Lychgate, which provides an explanation for why SCaP is stated as not happening despite Allen retaining his knowledge and memories from its events, is recent and signals mothy's current intention for what SCaP is. So, it doesn't matter if him changing his mind is part of this, because he'd be changing his mind to what the current theory is--that SCaP takes place in the alternate Evillious where Allen failed. Regardless of whether or not that was his original intention for SCaP.

So again--''what is it about the current evidence that is not sufficient? ''