Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6192846-20150822000535/@comment-6986530-20150827165838

Can we have a rule to not use "it's mothy" as a legitimate argument in debates because it really doesn't mean anything anymore.

We know how the Third Period ends, and it's not this. We also know how the First Period ends in that we know hundreds of gods got on the Ark, not 72. It is referring to the end of the Second Period, plain and simple. To use "real life logic," history tends to occasionally flow in vague patterns, not specific "all of these variables will be exactly the same" patterns.

But to address Guardian588, nothing confirmed Gudonechia is the First Period and no, there was nothing stating Levia and Behemo got on bad terms before the destruction of Gudonechia. (bold for emphasis) There is nothing stating Levia and Behemo were even alive in the First Period.

For all we know, the Second Period consisted of more than one planet and Gudonechia was one of them. Or Behemo was born on Gudonechia, if it's the First Period, and grew up in the Second Period.

Or, since Behemo in this would be another universe, Behemo ''is just referring to the fact that his homeworld is in a different dimension and also met its end. Gudonechia could be the Second Period of Behemo's world.''