Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6986530-20200202004408/@comment-6986530-20200214034017

You're making a lot of sense, really 0o0/ I think you're right, it seems it's about the amount of exposure to the content covered as much as it is said content. Like, if someone watching would be outright told/shown this is happening or if it's being hinted/heavily hinted. Another odd example to me (which is admittedly non-ec) was Kilmer, which is marked as questionable instead of explicit; among other things it has sexual slavery and two murders as part of the video's plot, but I guess it's not "explicit" because the lyrics aren't expositing the events of the story and these things are just offscreen or only alluded to in the pv.

So basically yeah following their example seems best for now.

The spoiler tag thing (I've seen it on other wikis too) is a pretty good idea, but it might be a little harder to execute. I vaguely recall that our previous attempts to make spoiler tags (though that was for reasons of page length) didn't go so well. It also assumes that the questionable elements of a character history are sectioned off from the not-so-questionable ones.